Pelosi to Wall Street: "Party's Over". House passes financial overhaul.

The U.S. House of Representatives today passed the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, 223-202. The House tightened rules for derivatives and created powers to break up large financial firms that threaten the economy, despite opposition from Wall Street and Republicans. Also included was the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency and stronger oversight of hedge funds. The bill also ends a ban that shielded the Federal Reserve from audits of its monetary policy decisions. The House failed to add language for mortgage "cram-downs". Passage of the House bill moves one step closer to achieving the White House objectives for financial reform. The focus now shifts to the Senate, where lawmakers lack a schedule for action on a bill.

Geithner Running Point on Reform

Although healthcare reform seemed to be pushing ahead of financial reform in the political dialogue race, President Obama's Lehman Anniversary speech on Wall Street last week seems to have re-energized the movement somewhat. While GlobalRiskJobs and Risk Talent Associates are definitely seeing an increase in activity on the financial risk and compliance front, we definitely expected more to see more robust signs of recovery on the hiring front at this point in the year. One of the preconditions to a wholesale shift has always been a more intense regulatory/reporting environment, which we still believe will come, but things have been slow to develop largely because of the traffic jam in Washington. So, with Geithner's focus now moving from crisis manager to running the point on financial reform, we will see where it takes us. Geithner seems to have simplified the message, focusing on three key points that legislators should consider when enacting financial reform: 1) offer “substantial” new protections to consumers and investors, 2) make the financial system less vulnerable to crisis, and 3) protect taxpayers from having to bail out future crises.

Are some of the regulators past the point of fixing? Bloomberg commentator Susan Antilla wonders as much about the SEC in a recent piece. She looks at Judge Rakoff's beat-down of the SEC-Bank of America settlement as just the latest example of a regulator that needs an overhaul. Meanwhile, the SEC is seeking more power to oversee derivatives markets.

GlobalRiskBlog favorite Andy Kessler weighs in on bank pay controls in today's Wall Street Journal. Kessler argues that it was excessive leverage, rather than excessive risk that drove the financial system to the brink of disaster.

As the G-20 convenes in Pittsburgh, U.S. and European leaders remain divided on how much capital the world's largest financial institutions should keep on hand to meet unexpected losses. Most agree that a major lesson of the Crisis is that higher capital requirements are essential, and G-20 leaders hope to have an agreement on new standards by the end of 2010, with implementation by the end of 2012.

Congress has turned its attention to the Rating Agencies. New allegations by a recently departed Moody's analyst named Eric Kolchinsky have added fuel to the debate over the role and influence of credit ratings and whether recent reforms are sufficient to prevent a repeat of past missteps.

The FDIC is being criticized for its handling of many of the recent bank failures. A recent report about the failure of Colorado-based New Frontier Bank criticizes the agency and other regulators for not being aggressive enough in handling the brewing financial crisis.

And finally, the controversial filmmaker Michael Moore is back in the headlines with "Capitalism: A Love Story", a scathing look at the financial system through the lens of the Crisis.

House bill proposes ban on naked CDS

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said "naked" credit default swaps may be banned in the overhaul of derivatives industry oversight. House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin Peterson (D-MN) said he is helping draft the legislation which would ban credit-default swaps where the investor doesn't own the underlying debt. Under the current proposal, market makers would be exempt from the ban. As much as 80% of the $26T CDS market is traded by investors who don't own the underlying debt.

Regulatory Turf Wars Gaining Steam

Lots of buzz this week about future oversight of the financial markets. While GlobalRiskJobs and GlobalComplianceJobs have been anticipating significant changes in the regulatory landscape, the political landscape has thus far provided more of a speed bump to true reform than initially thought. The Obama Administration is (finally) expected to finish up a plan to present to Congress by the end of June, but the timetable for any reform plan to be approved by Congress looks like the end of this year. The Obama administration has been pushing a more radical reform agenda, while existing regulators naturally have sought to defend their existing turf. As a result, no firm regulatory structure has yet to emerge. The primary issue seems to be whether to reorganize the basic structure of oversight, or whether to implement new rules at existing agencies that would accomplish the same end. It would seem that, given the scope of this crisis, if there was ever a time where legislators and te public would be willing to accept a radical overhaul, now would be it. The adminsitration has had its hands full with the issue of bank supervision, and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) which has come under fire for its seeming impotence in the AIG, WAMU and IndyMac fiascos is likely to be sacrificed first in the name of reform. Also on the table is a merger of the SEC and the CFTC, although House Financial Services Committe Chairman Barney Frank is not a supporter of such a move. Another political sticking point surrounds the idea of a systemic risk regulator. Treasury wants the Fed to become a financial market uber-regulator responsible for systemic risk, although many politicians and regulators are reluctant to concentrate so much power at the Fed. As mentioned last week, a new Financial Products Safety Commission has also been proposed, although Mary Schapiro naturally opposes any threat to diminish SEC power and lashed out against the idea. Another battle on the Hill is brewing between Frank and House Agriculture Committe Chairman Collin Peterson surrounding who will get authority to regulate credit default swaps. The Ag Committees in Congress traditionally oversee the CFTC and oppose any challenge to their authority.

The Links:

• The FT details some of battles being fought over bank regulation.
  
• Bloomberg's Alison Vekshin has written a good profile of FDIC Chief Sheila Bair.
• Wall Street is having its say in the battle over derivatives regulation. Banks want to preserve the intra-dealer market and raise barriers to new entrants to keep the OTC business as compartmentalized as possible.
• The FT believes regulatory authority in the US should be assigned by function, not product.
• EU banking regulators may get the power to overrule national banking authorities under new plans in the works as a response to the financial crisis.
• The WSJ comments on the derivatives PR war going on inside the Beltway.
  

Is Warren's Financial Product Safety Commission on Tap?

The Washington Post reports that the Obama Administration is actively discussing the creation of a regulatory commission that would have broad authority to protect consumers who use financial products as varied as mortgages, credit cards and mutual funds. The move would require legislation, and would centralize regulatory authority that is currently spread among a group of federal agencies. The proposal is sure to be opposed by financial services industry groups who will continue to argue that such regulation will crimp access to such financial products. Additionally, such a move could intensify political wrangling among existing regulators like the OCC, Fed and SEC as they battle to hold onto legacy powers.

The idea is believed to have sprung from a plan proposed by Harvard Law professor Elizabeth Warren, who now chairs the Congressional Oversight Panel for the US Government's financial rescue initiative. Warren wrote in a 2007 article in the journal Democracy called "Unsafe at Any Rate" that the government had failed to protect American consumers in their relationships with financial companies and that it was now time for a Financial Product Safety Commission.
------

The Links:

• WSJ's Gordon Crovitz says that Geithner's focus on disclosure over regulation when it comes to derivatives constitutes smart reform.
• The FT says that the derivatives industry is girding for battle.
• Gillian Tett, author of "Fool's Gold: How the Bold Dream of a Small Tribe at J.P. Morgan was Corrupted by Wall Street Greed and Unleashed a Catastrophe" is out promoting her book. She thinks she has a sense of what Main Street thinks of Wall Street.
• Jamie Dimon speaks out about rules preventing US banks from hiring foreigners.

Please sir, I want some more (regulation)...

"We are looking at a world where the fist of government will be stronger than the invisible hand of the market"

--Mohamed El-Erian, Chief Executive Officer of PIMCO, 5/19/09

In El-Erian's May Outlook piece, he envisions a banking system that is a shadow of its former self. Regulation will be more expansive in form and reach, and the sector will be "de-risked, de-levered, and subject to greater burden sharing. The forces of consolidation and shrinkage will spread beyond banks, impacting a host of non-bank financial institutions as well as the investment management industry".

At GlobalRiskJobs and GlobalComplianceJobs, we can't help but nod in agreement when we hear things like this. We have been anticipating such an environment as the pound of flesh to be exacted in the wake of the Great Meltdown, and when high profile investors like El-Erian go on record with such comments, it sends the signal that the government is a long way from backing down from intnsifying the regulatory environment. Thus far, it seems there has been much talk and little action on the "new normal" that has been talked about. It appears that many banks, asset managers, and other finance companies are engaged in a game of personnel "chicken". They seem to know in their hearts that a new regime is coming that will require new bodies; professionals with the expertise and experience to help them comply with new legal and risk reporting requirements that will certainly be part of the this new environment. But, the overall trend appears to be one of wait and see. When are the requirements going to come? June? August? October? Why not hold out until the last minute and hire when the government imposed deadline is looming? Well, there are lots of reasons not to do that, first and foremost being the tone of the employment environment. When the deadline is looming, how many others will be in the same boat? Lots. And a basic understanding of supply and demand would tell one that when the talent market tightens one pays a lot more for that talent. Look no further than Sarbanes-Oxley for Exhibit A from the recent past. And, guess what else becomes a real issue? Retention of existing employees. Because, when there is a bid out there in the market and the phones start ringing it will make everyone wearing a risk or compliance hat a more valuable commodity.

The links:

• A new credit card reform bill was passed by the Senate and is on its way to President Obama.
• The Federal Reserve will include legacy assets for the first time in a $1 trillion program to revive credit markets, expanding the effort to commercial real estate securities issued before the start of this year.
• NY governor Andrew Cuomo sued two debt settlement firms for deceiving consumers and false advertising.
• Treasury Secretary Geithner said the government should not impose caps on executive pay.
• New fees proposed by the FDIC would hit big banks harder than small ones.
• The FT weighs in on Geithner's plans to regulate the derivatives markets.
  

Taming the Derivatives Tiger

The Obama administration asked Congress yesterday to move quickly on legislation that would allow federal oversight of derivatives like credit default swaps. Geithner said the measure should require swaps to be exchange traded and backed by capital reserves. The adminsitration is also seeking repeal of of major portions of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 which kept derivatives mostly unregulated (endorsed, incidentally, by then Treasury Secretary Larry Summers). The new measure would give regulatory oversight to the CTFC and the SEC. ISDA issued its own comments in the wake of the news.

Geithner also stated that the administration would be laying out a comprehensive proposal to overhaul the regulation of the financial system. A centerpiece to the plan will be eliminating the ability of companies to pick the most favorable regulator.

So, will moving derivatives to an exchange help prevent future meltdowns? TMX Group CEO Thomas Kloet believes it can.

The links:

• Paul Kanjorski, the chairman of an influential House subcommittee said the federal government, not the states, should have the primary responsibility for overseeing the insurance industry. he said Congress must address insurance activities as part of the broader overhaul of financial regulations.
  
  
• The SEC moved to impose new rules on money managers to safeguard client holdings in the wake of Madoff's $65B Ponzi scheme. SEC commissioners voted 5-0 today on a proposal to subject about 9,600 investment advisors to annual surprise inspections by independent auditors to make sure they have adequate procedures to protect client assets.
  
  
• The Federal Reserve may revise rules that currently favor the established credit rating agencies. The Fed currently only accepts collateral ranked by the major NRSROs (Moody's, S&P, Fitch) and is conducting its review as the number of NRSROs is increasing.
  

• R.I.P Bill Seidman. The former head of the FDIC and RTC died yesterday in Albuquerque, NM at the age of 88.